Comments to Energy Guest Commentary
The TRHS seniors did a “Speeding in Highlands Ranch” research project to see how much money can be generated from drivers who want to speed over the posted speed limits. Their research showed that over 4,000 drivers were ticketed for speeding in Highlands Ranch in 2008. At some point in driving an auto, the faster the car goes, it begins to lose gasoline consumption efficiency. Whether it’s higher or lower than 55MPH, that wasn’t the point of the high school study. The point was to penalize drivers for driving above the speed limit and tie the speeding fine into an “energy efficiency” penalty. If Douglas County wanted to enact a surcharge on speeders in Douglas County, the voters would have the chance to vote for or against the bill.
GUEST COMMENTARY
Name: bob | E-mail: baahawbaker@q.com
The following information gleaned from the traffic study blog site is misleading and erroneous. 1. Just because you drive faster than 55 mph doesn’t mean you are “speeding”. 2. Just because California says it is wasteful to “speed over 55 mph” doesn’t make it a scientific fact. Sitting in traffic wastes fuel also…are you proposing to fine everyone in a traffic jam for wasting fuel? 3. Finally, issuance of a surcharge is not a logical follow up to driving faster than 55 mph.
“In California it was released that all speeding over 55mph waste fuel efficiency and is therefore applicable for a surcharge”.
Posted Apr 20, 1:09 AM — Post “Keen Interest in State Capitol for Energy City Vision”
##########
Venture capitalist have shown an interest in this project. A company with venture or angel funding are bound by the board of director’s control and decision-making in order to protect the financial investment. We decided to not have outside interests to control the energy city of Highlands Ranch. The voters of Highlands Ranch would form an energy city and appoint local residents to be on the board.
It is not true that the “City” is telling energy start-ups who would leave the energy incubator that they have to keep their business within the confines of Highlands Ranch or Douglas County. There is no energy city or energy businesses today to even listen to that sort of message. The energy city goal is to attract and retain new energy start-ups to Highlands Ranch. When they leave the incubator, the business is free to leave Colorado if that would make their business stronger and more viable.
Lastly, there are no speeding fine proposals being “advanced” (per the guest commentary). All that has transpired is that on March 3, 2009, a TRHS senior presented his speeding study findings to the Douglas County Commissioners and the senior requested that the board consider the study findings for future review.
GUEST COMMENTARY
Name: Bob / E-mail: baahawbaker@q.com | IP: 97.118.10.156
If the energy incubator was such a good idea, venture capitalists would be interested and you would turning them away at the door. Mr. Taraborelli stated that venture capitalist tend to want control…the new “City” wouldn’t want control over their venture? From the articles I’ve read the “City” is already telling the new companies they have to relocate in Highlands Ranch or elsewhere in Douglas County upon leaving the Incubator. That reeks of control to me. Additionally, proposals are already being advanced to add an “energy fine” for speeding tickets of 500 dollars or more. Who “controls” this. If your goal is to drive out residents this is a good beginning.
Posted Apr 20, 12:54 AM — Post “Keen Interest in State Capitol for Energy City Vision”



