<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keen Interest in State Capitol for Energy City Vision</title>
	<link>http://renewablehighlandsranch.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/keen-interest-in-state-capital-for-energy-city-vision/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel/Energy Economy</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bob</title>
		<link>http://renewablehighlandsranch.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/keen-interest-in-state-capital-for-energy-city-vision/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:09:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://renewablehighlandsranch.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/keen-interest-in-state-capital-for-energy-city-vision/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>The following information gleaned from the traffic study blog site is misleading and erroneous.  1. Just because you drive faster than 55 mph doesn't mean you are &quot;speeding&quot;.  2. Just because California says it is wasteful to &quot;speed over 55 mph&quot; doesn't make it a scientific fact.  Sitting in traffic wastes fuel also...are you proposing to fine everyone in a traffic jam for wasting fuel?  3. Finally, issuance of a surcharge is not a logical follow up to driving faster than 55 mph.

&quot;In California it was released that all speeding over 55mph waste fuel efficiency and is therefore applicable for a surcharge&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The following information gleaned from the traffic study blog site is misleading and erroneous.  1. Just because you drive faster than 55 mph doesn&#8217;t mean you are &#8220;speeding&#8221;.  2. Just because California says it is wasteful to &#8220;speed over 55 mph&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make it a scientific fact.  Sitting in traffic wastes fuel also&#8230;are you proposing to fine everyone in a traffic jam for wasting fuel?  3. Finally, issuance of a surcharge is not a logical follow up to driving faster than 55 mph.</p>
	<p>&#8220;In California it was released that all speeding over 55mph waste fuel efficiency and is therefore applicable for a surcharge&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bob</title>
		<link>http://renewablehighlandsranch.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/keen-interest-in-state-capital-for-energy-city-vision/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:54:43 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://renewablehighlandsranch.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/keen-interest-in-state-capital-for-energy-city-vision/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>If the energy incubator was such a good idea, venture capitalists would be interested and you would turning them away at the door.  Mr. Taraborelli stated that venture capitalist tend to want control...the new &quot;City&quot; wouldn't want control over their venture?  From the articles I've read the &quot;City&quot; is already telling the new companies they have to relocate in Highlands Ranch or elsewhere in Douglas County upon leaving the Incubator.  That reeks of control to me.  Additionally, proposals are already being advanced to add an &quot;energy fine&quot; for speeding tickets of 500 dollars or more.  Who &quot;controls&quot; this.  If your goal is to drive out residents this is a good beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If the energy incubator was such a good idea, venture capitalists would be interested and you would turning them away at the door.  Mr. Taraborelli stated that venture capitalist tend to want control&#8230;the new &#8220;City&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t want control over their venture?  From the articles I&#8217;ve read the &#8220;City&#8221; is already telling the new companies they have to relocate in Highlands Ranch or elsewhere in Douglas County upon leaving the Incubator.  That reeks of control to me.  Additionally, proposals are already being advanced to add an &#8220;energy fine&#8221; for speeding tickets of 500 dollars or more.  Who &#8220;controls&#8221; this.  If your goal is to drive out residents this is a good beginning.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
